Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,813
ABUAN v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Robert Abuan
Respondent:
Joe Biden, United States and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Strand et al v. Warden
as 5:2023cv01189
Petitioner:
John Herbert Strand and Simone Gold
Respondent:
FNU Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Phillips v. Hamilton
as 5:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Cole Isaac Phillips
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Ledbetter
as 6:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Bridges
as 5:2023cv01150
Petitioner:
Samuel Patrick Cain, Jr
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logsdon v. Cassidy
as 6:2023cv00420
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr.
Respondent:
Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. LNU
as 5:2023cv01135
Petitioner:
Patrick Rodriguez
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendenhall v Seminole Nation
as 6:2023cv00418
Petitioner:
Stoney Ray Mendenhall
Counter Defendant:
Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Small v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Vincent Harry Small
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
