Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 4,813
Pittman v. Miller
as 5:2023cv01086
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Christain Pittman
Respondent:
Warden Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hendricks v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv01078
Petitioner:
Allen Ray Hendricks
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Funk v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Killsfirst v. Harding
as 5:2023cv01076
Petitioner:
Charles Benjamin Killsfirst
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zodoq-El v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01088
Petitioner:
Nanya Maluk Zodoq-El
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Department of Corrections and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv01064
Petitioner:
Lee Earnest Price, III
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Seals v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Michael Dwayne Seals and Michael Dwayne Washington
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Yargee v. Rogers
as 4:2023cv00501
Petitioner:
David Yargee
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 5:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
