US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Cases filed


Cases 81 - 90 of 295,059
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv03698
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
MARTIN v. MERCK & CO., INC., et al
as 2:2019cv03684
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff: TERESSA MARTIN, PATRICK MARTIN
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
DELANCEY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03682
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff: CONNIE DELANCEY, ROBERT DELANCEY
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv03694
Plaintiff: DOMINIQUE JOHNSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
EAGEL v. HANES et al
as 2:2019cv03692
Defendant: HERMAN HANES, BUCKS COUNTY TRANSPORT, INC.
Plaintiff: TARA EAGEL
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
WOLFGRAMM v. COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 13301 et al
as 2:2019cv03701
Plaintiff: ROSAMUND A. WOLFGRAMM
Defendant: BETH NORTON, COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 2-13, DENNIS EICHFELD and others
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Race)
BALLIET v. ESURANCE PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv03691
Defendant: ESURANCE PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: DENISE BALLIET
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
BROWN v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2019cv03689
Respondent: OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: JEREMY BROWN
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03678
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff: KERMIT JONES
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
ABBRUZZESE v. RENZI
as 2:2019cv03668
Defendant: EDWARD RENZI
Plaintiff: PAULA ABBRUZZESE
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?