US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 60 of 51,601
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 1:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swartz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Justin Swartz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Strine v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Donna Jean Strine
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Castro-Mota v. Miesel, ET AL
as 3:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Dale Miesel, CO. and Superintenden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Katona v. Apgar et al
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Matthew Katona
Defendant:
Joseph Apgar, Ashley Rzesewski, Shane Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Prime Care Medical, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Kaldes et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
George Kaldes, Photini Kaldes, Kaldes, Inc. doing business as Al's Cafe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
