Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 19,007
HOPKINS v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv01670
Petitioner: JAMES THOMAS HOPKINS
Respondent: MR. ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLORES-LOPEZ v. LOWE
as 1:2021cv01938
Petitioner: Miguel Angel Flores-Lopez
Respondent: Craig A. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NESTOR v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2021cv00319
Petitioner: RUSSELL NESTOR
Respondent: WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. TICE et al
as 5:2021cv05135
Petitioner: ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HART v. ANGELUCCI
as 2:2021cv05085
Petitioner: JOHN HART
Respondent: STEPHEN ANGELUCCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Warden of SCI-Frackville et al
as 4:2021cv01956
Petitioner: Rashawn J. Williams
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Frackville and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vazquez v. Warden of SCI-Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv01928
Petitioner: Danny Vazquez
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Dallas and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHOEMAKER v. HAUSER et al
as 2:2021cv01649
Petitioner: JERRY LYNN SHOEMAKER
Respondent: MORRIS HAUSER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reynolds v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv01934
Petitioner: Michael Curtis Reynolds
Respondent: Eric Williams, Dr. Faisal Vakil Ahmed and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon, III v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01929
Petitioner: Derrick Lamont Dixon, III
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?