Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 239
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Petitioner:
LEWIS M. JORDAN
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO, MARIROSA LAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REGA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv01781
Petitioner:
ROBERT GENE REGA
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01666
Petitioner:
Harve Johnson
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Louis S. Folino and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
HANNIBAL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00619
Petitioner:
SHELDON HANNIBAL
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, LOUIS B. FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
May v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2012cv02572
Plaintiff:
Freeman May
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Louis Folino and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
SANCHEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2012cv06546
Petitioner:
ABRAHAM SANCHEZ, JR.
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
MAISONET v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv06484
Petitioner:
ORLANDO MAISONET
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
RAMTAHAL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv05154
Petitioner:
DAVID RAMTAHAL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PHILISTIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv04460
Petitioner:
BORGELA PHILISTIN
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spotz v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv01327
Petitioner:
Mark Newton Spotz
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Louis S. Folino and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
