US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 121 - 130 of 111,043
Hawkins v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv02341
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as United States Postal Service and Kizmet Ruth
Plaintiff:
Earl Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Johnson v. Ragon Transport LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02346
Plaintiff:
Kathryne Johnson
Defendant:
Ragon Transport LLC and Jose Cruz Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Andrew Travis Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Valdes Cruz v. Humphrey
as 1:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Silvio Valdes Cruz
Respondent:
C Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Weatherall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02350
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Howard Weatherall, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02351
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Howard Weatherall, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02352
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Howard Weatherall, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright-Nasalski v. Fikes
as 4:2024cv00886
Petitioner:
Devon Wright-Nasalski
Respondent:
W. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
