Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 41,203
Jewell v. Hebert et al
as 1:2025cv00050
Plaintiff:
Roy T. Jewell
Defendant:
L. Hebert, M. Guillory, John Shauberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-CID et al

as 1:2025cv00049
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rico Rodriguez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice-CID, Director, TDCJ-CID, FNU Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2025cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joseph Burpee
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Goodman Unit and Stiles Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2025cv00104
Plaintiff:
Earl Williams
Defendant:
Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. San Antonio Police Department et al
as 5:2025cv00119
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hernandez
Defendant:
San Antonio Police Department and S.A.P.D. Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. San Antonio Police Department et al
as 5:2025cv00122
Plaintiff:
Gumaro Castro
Defendant:
San Antonio Police Department, Officer #1 and Officer #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2025cv00045
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, James Danheim and Thomas Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. Allen
as 6:2025cv00034
Plaintiff:
Joseph Burpee
Defendant:
Mr Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burpee v. Hamilton et al
as 6:2025cv00035
Plaintiff:
Joseph Burpee
Defendant:
Julie Hamilton and Captain James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Ndaru
as 9:2025cv00026
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennie K. Ndaru
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.