District Court Cases in Virginia
Cases 71 - 80 of 93,648
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration and Naturalization Act
Board Of Supervisors Of Accomack County v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Board Of Supervisors Of Accomack County
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Portsmouth, Virginia v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00276
Defendant:
Evernorth Health Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Portsmouth, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zinner v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Edward M. Zinner
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemens v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
