West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 3,190
Crawford v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kelly Crawford
Defendant:
Camryn T. Daniels, Boone County Sheriff's Office, Boone County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gottfried v. Pacholke
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Gottfried
Defendant:
Correctional Officer C. Pacholke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, William Marshall, III, Jeff Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wasanyi v. Aramark Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
David M. Wasanyi
Defendant:
Aramark Services Incorporated and Brittany Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Conover
as 5:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Jaime Conover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Larry v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Orlando Larry
Defendant:
John Doe, or in the Alternative, Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beckett v. Shrewsbury et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Brian Beckett
Defendant:
Aaron Shrewsbury and City of Mount Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Shrewsbury et al
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nelson
Defendant:
Aaron Shrewsbury and City of Mount Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Jasman Raheem Montgomery
Respondent:
Gregory Jones, Shelby Searls and Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppheard et al v. Justice et al
as 5:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sheppheard, Tyler Randall, Adam Perry and others
Defendant:
James C. Justice, Jr. and Mark Sorsaia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
