District Court Cases in Wisconsin
Cases 41 - 50 of 48,216
Dickerson, Darius v. Ozaukee County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2025cv00022
Defendant:
Hospital in Port Washington, WI, Ozaukee County Sheriff Dept., Dr. Jane or John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Becerra Quinones, Jose Luis v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2025cv00025
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Becerra Quinones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Palermo Villa Inc v. Samuels et al
as 2:2025cv00060
Defendant:
Justin Samuels and Samuel Rockwell
Plaintiff:
Palermo Villa Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Richmond v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 2:2025cv00058
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Richmond
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase and Aetna Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foutch v. Knobloch
as 2:2025cv00059
Defendant:
Lynn Marie Knobloch
Plaintiff:
Lynn Marie Foutch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Biller v. City of New Berlin
as 2:2025cv00066
Plaintiff:
Chance Biller
Defendant:
City of New Berlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watzka v. Ribault et al
as 1:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Samuel Richard Watzka
Defendant:
Edward R Neisner, Dr Justin S Ribault and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poff v. Scullion et al
as 2:2025cv00051
Defendant:
Jacob Cirian, Capt Taylor, Sheryl Kinyon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Poff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strain, Casey v. Murphy, Angela
as 3:2025cv00017
Defendant:
Angela Murphy
Plaintiff:
Casey Strain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Seay v. Johnson
as 2:2025cv00055
Petitioner:
Demond Seay
Respondent:
Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.