Cases 31 - 40 of 85,514
LANE v. RUCINSKI
as 2:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
MR. DUSTIN HYRUM LANE
Defendant:
STATE TROOPER MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER HURL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS WHITE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER HURL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SCHWAGER v. BEILEY et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER, ADAM CHARLES and CHASE SCHWAGER
Defendant:
MATTHEW BEILEY and AMER WILLIAM WHITFEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COSTIN v. TEAM CAR CARE et al
as 1:2024cv07053
Plaintiff:
JAMERE COSTIN
Defendant:
TEAM CAR CARE doing business as JIFFY LUBE, FRANK LEAR and KENNY FLEMING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: CHARKETA REID
as 2:2024cv02679
Plaintiff:
CHARKETA REID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 24-2132
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant:
SUZANNE V. HEATH, JAMES FOSNOT, DAVID EBBERT and others
Tony Haile v. Administrator South Woods State Prison, et al
as 24-2088
Plaintiff:
TONY HAILE
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Lauren Daly v. Superintendent Cambridge Springs SCI, et al
as 24-2070
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DALY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Berenato v. Commonwealth of PA
as 1:2024cv01005
Petitioner:
David M. Berenato
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
