Cases 61 - 70 of 66,556
Buford v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00778
Defendant:
Well Path and Sharon Rollans
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillard v. Miller County, Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04096
Defendant:
Miller County, Arkansas
Petitioner:
Robert Gillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyman v. Stamps et al
as 5:2024cv05194
Defendant:
John Doe Transport Deputies, Nurse Tracey Robinson, John Doe Employees of Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Lyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyman v. Wright et al
as 5:2024cv05192
Defendant:
Asst. Jail Admin Megan Rutledge, Lieutenant Tyler Ross, Sergent Brittney Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Lyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyman v. Robinson
as 5:2024cv05193
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Lyman
Defendant:
Nurse Tracey Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. STJ Apartments AR LLC
as 4:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Nichomas Bennett
Defendant:
STJ Apartments AR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Morris v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00173
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Edgmon v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 2:2024cv02117
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as Dollar General
Plaintiff:
James Edgmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federman, PC v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv05191
Plaintiff:
William B. Federman, PC doing business as Federman & Sherwood
Defendant:
Riley Park, KAD Oncology Specialists, LLC. and Kathleen Sue Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
