Cases 91 - 100 of 37,922
Auleciems et al v. Township Of West Lakeland, MN et al
as 0:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
Karl Auleciems and Susanne Auleciems
Defendant:
Township Of West Lakeland, MN, Washington County Minnesota, Dan Kyllo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Placzek
as 8:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Walter Holloway
Defendant:
Matthew Placzek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
Hankey v. Beazley et al
as 2:2024cv04102
Plaintiff:
Kyra L. Hankey
Defendant:
Hunter Beazley, Ian Romig, Kyle Towles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Delk v. Tuma et al
as 0:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Delk
Defendant:
Jaclyn Johnson Tuma, Daniel Michael Misgen, Cody Elvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Leslie Torgerson v. Roberts County of South Dakota, et al
as 24-1931
Plaintiff:
Leslie Torgerson
Defendant:
Roberts County of South Dakota, Tyler Appel, in his individual and official capacities, Zachary Angerhofer, in his individual and official capacities and others
King v. Bellinger
as 0:2024cv02432
Plaintiff:
Arron King
Defendant:
Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Ogastien et al
as 0:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Ogastien, Henipen County Jail, SGT who Denied my agreviece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
