Cases 1 - 10 of 111,906
Lopez et al v. Dakich et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ph.D. Dr. Linda Lopez and Impact Strategies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dakich, Ryan D. Lafler, Greater South Shore Technology Initiative, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Campos v. Walmart Inc
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Maria Campos
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DEVINE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Wilson v. Mayes
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Billy Asher Wilson
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stonebraker et al v. LF2 Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mason Stonebraker and Tiffany Edwards
Defendant:
LF2 Inc., LF4 Inc., LF7 Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
