Cases 101 - 110 of 3,521
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE 2ND CIVIL COURT OF INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN ANKARA, TURKEY
as 3:2024mc80102
Petitioner:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Google LLC
Bootler, LLC v. Google, LLC
as 1:2024cv03660
Plaintiff:
Bootler, LLC d/b/a FoodBoss
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Google LLC v. Goel
as 3:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Google LLC
Defendant:
Surendra Goel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK PAYMENTS, INC., FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
SoundClear Technologies LLC v. Google LLC
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
SoundClear Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
Patel v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel and Raj Patel
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
In Re Ex Parte Application of Min-ji Kim et al
as 5:2024mc80072
Not Yet Classified:
Google, LLC
Plaintiff:
Min-ji Kim, Pham Ngoc Han, Ji-hye Mo and others
Harding et al v. Google LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02581
Plaintiff:
Randy Harding and Elizabeth Harding
Defendant:
Google LLC and YouTube LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
