Cases 51 - 60 of 22,104
Ross v. Guilford et al (CONSENT)
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guilford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Robinson v. Brice (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tonya Robinson
Defendant:
Jay S. Brice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Malloy et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Malloy, Capt. Surles, Lt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duck et al v. PNC Bank (MAG2)
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Brandon Duck and The Estate of Tommy Guy Duck
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Quality Reimbursement Services, Inc. v. Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Quality Reimbursement Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. doing business as Jackson Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hardy v. Barnes
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Hardy
Defendant:
Lee Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raley v. Pitts et al
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Raley
Defendant:
Jonathan Pitts, Clay Conway, Mike Cheshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 120711 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
