Cases 81 - 90 of 334,247
Stidham et al
as 6:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Glenda Stidham and Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morgan v. SSA
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Billie Morgan
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dobson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2024cv03585
Plaintiff:
Jared Dobson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
US Attorney - Social Security Noticing and Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Strickland v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ryan Strickland
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Towns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kevin Towns
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanchez v.O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03654
Plaintiff:
Richard M Sanchez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Speaks v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01768
Plaintiff:
Linda Speaks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jordan-Harris v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
Nakia Jordan-Harris
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Duncan v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Leisa Gail Duncan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
