Cases 31 - 40 of 20,937
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BURNHAM v. PORTLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN BURNHAM
Defendant:
PORTLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY and MAINE HOUSING doing business as MAINE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Saade v. Bee Investments et al
as 1:2024cv11403
Plaintiff:
Jack Saade
Defendant:
Bee Investments and Does
Counter Defendant:
Bruce Efron
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Howard v. Bisenius, et al
as 24-1502
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HOWARD
Defendant:
THERESA A. BISENIUS, JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK, MARY RUDOLPH BLACK and others
Heredia v. Roscoe, et al
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
CHASRICK HEREDIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROSCOE, CANADA STEWART, MATTHEW NOCELLA and others
Maroney, et al v. Fiorentini
as 24-1508
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MARONEY, as Trustee of Premiere Realty Trust and MARONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES J. FIORENTINI, indivisually and in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Haverhill, ROBERT E. WARD, individually and in his capacity as Deputy Director of Public Works of the City of Haverhill Water/Wastewater Division and HAVERHILL, MA
Heredia v. Roscoe, et al
as 24-1505
Plaintiff:
CHASRICK HEREDIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROSCOE, CANADA STEWART, MATTHEW NOCELLA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
WHITE v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
PAULA WHITE
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, DALE P LANCASTER, MICHAEL PIKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
