Cases 71 - 80 of 245,070
Lumio HX, Inc. v. Ciccio
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Lumio HX, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Ciccio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Brooks v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Trina Luv Brooks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v Wyoming Governor et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Defendant:
Wyoming Governor, Gillette Mayor, Former Gillette City Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce B Williams and The Hypatian Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hough v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Malik Hough
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, (fnu) Carter, (fnu) Alatary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States v. Ulibarri
as 24-2080
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MANUEL JONATHAN ULIBARRI, AKA Manuel Ulibarri
United States v. Shelton
as 24-6100
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RODNEY JOE SHELTON
Hunter v. King, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER
Defendant:
ALEXIS KING, District Attorney for the 1st Judicial District, in her official capacity, CHRIS SCHAFFER, Director of the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, CHIEF SMITH, Chief of Police for the Lakewood Police Department, in his individual capacity and others
National Association for Gun Rights, et al v. Polis
as 24-1209
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER JAMES HIESTAND RICHARDSON, MAX EDWIN SCHLOSSER and others
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
