Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 22,103
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Jamie Mills
Defendant: John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfreds v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff: John Doe and Matthew B. Alfreds
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pepper v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff: Joseph Pepper
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garrett v. United States of America (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Justin Garrett
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: Angela Donald
Defendant: John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff: Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant: John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mid & Hinge Co., Ltd. v. Chul
as 2:2024mc04026
Plaintiff: Mid & Hinge Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Kim Chul
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2024mc04027
Not Yet Classified: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
Petitioner: Cleveland Jackson and James Hanna
State of Alabama v. Hammond (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff: State of Alabama
Defendant: Ketavious Javon Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?