Cases 11 - 20 of 22,094
Carter v. Gordy (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00359
Petitioner:
Edmond A. Carter
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russaw v. United States Marshal Service et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Alexander Russaw
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Anthony T. Bergamine, Denzel Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. U.S. Post Office (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Carlissa Murphy
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC d/b/a Hyundai Manufacturing of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Daniel v. Veteran Affairs et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Veteran Affairs, Health Department and Glen Holding Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macon v. Marvin et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
James Isiah Macon
Defendant:
W. Marvin, Department of Corrections, Kilby Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
