Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 158,108
AMOS v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: EDDIE AMOS
Defendant: WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT, WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN, DR JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv01574
Plaintiff: Joshua Douglas Henderson
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennefield v. Odom
as 5:2024cv00047
Petitioner: Fernando Bennefield
Respondent: Roy Odom
Not Yet Classified: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02849
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
MOTON v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: RAEQWON S MOTON
Defendant: JONES, WESTBURY, DUVALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Retic v. John Hutton, et al
as 24-12082
Plaintiff: ANTHONY RETIC
Defendant: JOHN HUTTON and MICHAEL J. JONES
Largin v. Raybon
as 7:2024cv00860
Petitioner: James Scott Largin
Respondent: Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos-Vasquez, Anibal v. Miami FDC
as 1:2024cv22488
Plaintiff: Anibal Ramos-Vasquez
Defendant: Miami FDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Roger Ussery
Defendant: Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?