Cases 21 - 30 of 242
Pelletier v. Aramark et al
as 6:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
Aramark, Yes Care, Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelletier v. Aramark et al
as 2:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
Aramark, Yes Care, Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Melvin D. Cooper
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Ms. Taylor-Boyd, Mr. Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. ARAMARK
as 3:2022cv22212
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
ARA MARK and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. Putnam County et al
as 3:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Hightower, Jr.
Defendant:
Putnam County, Gator Deloach, Mattew Metz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelletier et al v. Ivey et al
as 6:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier, Randy Borges, Jerimiah Young and others
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, W. Singletary, T. Cerio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selger v. Aramark et al
as 4:2022cv10073
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Selger
Defendant:
Aramark and Monroe County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 1:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. McCormick
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HANNON et al v. ODURO, et al
as 7:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
BRENDON HANNON and VICKI HANNON
Defendant:
OFORI THEOPHILLUS ODURO and ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
THOMAS v. HALL et al
as 3:2022cv07427
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE THOMAS
Defendant:
LESLIE HALL and ARAMARK SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
