Cases 51 - 60 of 90,585
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant:
C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2024mc04027
Not Yet Classified:
Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
Petitioner:
Cleveland Jackson and James Hanna
Alabama Somerby LLC v. Lagniappe National Construction LLC
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Alabama Somerby LLC
Defendant:
Lagniappe National Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jane Doe I et al v. The Gentleman's Club, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, Jane Doe III and others
Defendant:
The Gentleman's Club, Inc. and William Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Truist Bank v. Cope et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
Bruce Christopher Cope and Power SRC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Young v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Mary Denise Young
Defendant:
William Lumpkin, Louvenia Lumpkin, Kanitra Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Lumpkin Highway Contracting, et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Mary Denise Young
Defendant:
Lumpkin Highway Contracting, William Lumpkin, Louvenia Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
