Cases 61 - 70 of 85,548
FINKLEA v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv07189
Petitioner:
LYONEL FINKLEA
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SELAGE v. MERCER CORRECTION CENTER
as 3:2024cv07178
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SELAGE
Defendant:
MERCER CORRECTION CENTER, CHARLES ELLIS, WARDEN, DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR ASA PARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LESANE v. FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
ERIC JAMEL LESANE
Defendant:
FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
REED v. AINSLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
S. JALIL REED
Defendant:
C.O. AINSLEY, C.O. COOPER and SGT NAHLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kramer v. USA
as 3:2024cv01021
Petitioner:
John Lewis Kramer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bullock, III. v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole et al
as 3:2024cv01018
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Bullock, III.
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Connelly, Jr. v. Warden Berks County Prison, et al
as 24-2099
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN BERKS COUNTY PRISON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COSTIN v. TEAM CAR CARE et al
as 1:2024cv07053
Plaintiff:
JAMERE COSTIN
Defendant:
TEAM CAR CARE doing business as JIFFY LUBE, FRANK LEAR and KENNY FLEMING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: CHARKETA REID
as 2:2024cv02679
Plaintiff:
CHARKETA REID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
