Cases 1 - 10 of 11,304
Li v. Mayorkas et al
as 5:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tonghua Li
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Thompson v. Ally Financial, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ryan Thompson
Defendant:
Ally Financial, Inc.
Genesis Capital, LLC v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2024mc00217
Plaintiff:
Genesis Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Richard Cunningham, Jr. and Elaine Marion Cunningham
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant:
United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gibas v. Houghton
as 1:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
Susan Marie Gibas
Respondent:
Keith J. Houghton
Maryland Election Integrity, LLC v. Maryland State Board of Elections
as 24-1449
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND ELECTION INTEGRITY, LLC and UNITED SOVEREIGN AMERICANS, INC.
Defendant:
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Amicus Curiae:
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW
Allen et al v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allen, Charles Thomas, Zoey Hott and others
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation doing business as ViaPath Technologies
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Violation of Federal Communications Act
Janeka Puranda v. Jared Neahusan
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
JANEKA PURANDA, Woman
Defendant:
JARED NEAHUSAN, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Loudoun County
Graham v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc
as 4:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Denise Graham
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Roberts v. Serrano Roberts
as 1:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Palmer Lewis Roberts
Respondent:
Cindy Christina Serrano Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
