Cases 21 - 30 of 564,666
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burandt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Corliss O. Burandt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED v. AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM et al
as 1:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, ASIA-PRAGMATICPLAY.COM, CHEATPRAGMATICPLAY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Coleman v. Holpzapfell
as 5:2024cv00229
Petitioner:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
Holpzapfell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tolliver v. Barker et al.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Hiram Tolliver
Defendant:
D. R. Barker, K. L. Ross, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Betty Barnett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
