Cases 11 - 20 of 2,282
Fleming v. Black Diamond Captl
as 24-30291
Plaintiff:
Troy Fleming, On behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Jarrod Nabor, On behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Davarian Ursin, On behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Black Diamond Capital Management L.L.C.
Galia v. Roundglass, LLC
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Erica Galia
Defendant:
Roundglass, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cristo v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Cristo
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Tarver v. Walmart Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tarver
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Glenn Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mustafa v. Prosegur Services Group Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Najla Mustafa
Defendant:
Prosegur Services Group, Inc. and Prosegur Security USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
De Santiago v. Shutterfly Lifetouch, LLC
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Presiphanie L. De Santiago
Defendant:
Shutterfly Lifetouch, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Spencer v. Shell Exploration
as 24-20173
Plaintiff:
Tim Spencer
Defendant:
Shell Exploration & Production Company
Bryant v. Texas City ISD
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Larry Bryant
Defendant:
Texas City ISD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Optum Labs, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCay Hill
Defendant:
Optum Labs, LLC and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gomez v. Garza
as 24-40271
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Garza, Cameron County Sheriff, Robert Gracia, Cameron County Chief Deputy Sheriff, Cameron County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
