Cases 81 - 90 of 66,533
McDonald v. Unicourt
as 4:2024cv00862
Defendant:
Unicourt
Plaintiff:
Tawaiin Rashad McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williams v. Upper E Apartments et al
as 3:2024cv02326
Defendant:
Upper E Apartments, Sam Lieberman, Eastwind Apartments and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Williams doing business as rolling Cash Upper E LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Archangel v. CITY OF HOUSTON et al
as 4:2024cv03436
Defendant:
Alexander S. Vinogradov, CITY OF HOUSTON and David J Crowder
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C Archangel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jolt Initiative, Inc. v. Paxton
as 1:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Jolt Initiative, Inc.
Defendant:
Attorney General Kenneth Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Woodward v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Defendant:
Baily Gray, Christopher Anderson, Edna Staniszewski and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
