Cases 1 - 10 of 100,155
England v. Lovette et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. England
Defendant:
Warden Lovette and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Smith v. Commonwealth of KY
as 1:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Lamar R. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith et al v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lamar R. Smith and Karen Pointer
Defendant:
Jeb Dennis, Jason Dfeil, Brandi Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgewater v. Frederick
as 2:2024cv03224
Petitioner:
Dominique Bridgewater
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenzie v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Demorris Sanchez McKenzie
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Burnett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burnett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Dickson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCoy
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Eads, Chief Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Clem
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Cortney Perry
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
