Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 91 - 100 of 71,663
MOSLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff: BRIAN J. MOSLEY
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
KNEELAND v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv01017
Plaintiff: Holly Kneeland
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. CENTERION CORPERATION et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff: EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant: CENTERION CORPERATION, VERDON, ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00315
Petitioner: BRETT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff: CHARLES BLAKLEY
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, K. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMPTON v. GALIPEAU
as 1:2024cv01016
Petitioner: DANIEL COMPTON
Respondent: GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MAHURIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01013
Plaintiff: PAUL M. MAHURIN
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
POWELL v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01042
Petitioner: MATT POWELL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?