Cases 131 - 140 of 102,050
HENSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR. et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
JARED MALACHI HENSON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR., STEVEN JACKSON, LISA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI and 500 INMATES OF THE PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01522
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sardon v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv01523
Defendant:
Dr Chin, Rachel Dodd, Dr Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Sardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Jones v. John Burle, et al
as 24-2044
Plaintiff:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
JOHN BURLE, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CHERYL HANSEN and others
Benjamin Ziogas v. Fourth District Appellate Court Clerk, et al
as 24-2046
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE ZIOGAS
Defendant:
FOURTH DISTRICT APPELLATE COURT CLERK, CRAIG DEARMOND, THOMAS HARRIS and others
Fisher v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
Joseph Alan Fisher
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeil v. Toms et al
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Bobby McNeil
Defendant:
Shawn Toms and Michael Weiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Godiwalla
as 2:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Taylor
Defendant:
Shirley Godiwalla, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nowels v. Moore
as 2:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Dionte Nowels
Defendant:
Mary Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
