Cases 31 - 40 of 631
Davis v. Oswald et al
as 3:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Oswald, Creasy, Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv05353
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis
Defendant:
Sheriff John D. Idleburg, Chief Clouse, Deputy Chief Kalfas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travers v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv04816
Plaintiff:
Rishon Travers
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, Jahaira Lopez, Aramark Commissary/Food Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snowden v. Aramark Management, LLC
as 1:2023cv04735
Plaintiff:
Jaime Snowden
Defendant:
Aramark Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SCOTT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ARAMARK SUPERVISOR and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
JOSHAWA S. COLLINS
Defendant:
DASHAUN ZATECKY, CORIZON HEALTH and ARAMARK FOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv50260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc. v Butterball LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04404
Plaintiff:
Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Butterball LLC, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein North America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Kielbasa v. Stephanie et al
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Casimir E Kielbasa
Defendant:
Stephanie, Latisha, Captain Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
