Cases 111 - 120 of 74,180
Watkins v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv02218
Petitioner:
Deon Cameron Watkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Garcia v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv02219
Petitioner:
Joel Llamas Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 0:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons, Tim Brennan, Conor R West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Torgerson et al
as 0:2024cv02188
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Adam Torgerson and Shannon Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walton v. Faribault Correctional
as 0:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Michael Walton
Defendant:
Faribault Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milcendeau v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
David James Milcendeau
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 4:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
bin Bey v. Gayden et al
as 4:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Dreke bin Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Gayden and Cpt. Unknown Fowelkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Hamm
as 4:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Tyson James Wade
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Brininstool et al
as 8:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hartman
Defendant:
Sgt. Unknown Brininstool, Cpt. Unknown Thomas, Cpl. Unknown Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
