Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 18,766
Neda Mehrabani v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04285
Petitioner: Neda Mehrabani
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(HC)Barai v. USA (55-00002:16-cr-00217)
as 2:2024cv01447
Petitioner: Sharmistha Barai
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. USA
as 2:2024cv00962
Petitioner: Don Eugene White
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00707
Petitioner: Lewis Dean Armstrong
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shields v. USA
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner: Forest Jacob Shields
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Childress v. USA
as 3:2024cv00815
Petitioner: Robert Lee Childress, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Saintillus v. USA
as 2:2024cv01308
Petitioner: Chaloner Saintillus
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wescogame v. USA
as 3:2024cv08088
Petitioner: Randy Redtail Wescogame and Randy Wescogame
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00846
Petitioner: William Oliver Smith
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miranda-Espinoza v. USA
as 2:2024cv01008
Petitioner: Jesus Emilio Miranda-Espinoza, Carlos Armenta-Vasquez, Jesus Miranda-Espinoza and others
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?