Cases 81 - 90 of 19,348
COMPTON v. GALIPEAU
as 1:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
DANIEL COMPTON
Respondent:
GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
JOHN E. THOMAS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOOD v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Defendant:
RICHARD GASKIN and DEZARAY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. PARKER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDNER v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
JALIEN GARDNER
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL, BOBBIE RIGGS, BURD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, LLC., GEO GROUP INC, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MILLER, LEVI DC GILLIS and JUSTIN MICHAEL BLUEHER
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, FUNKHOUSER and LOHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINTON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WIGGINTON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
