Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 101 - 110 of 31,039
USA v. 2019 Harley-Davidson FLTRXS Road Glide Special With Vin Ending x8790 et al
as 6:2024cv00066
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 2019 Harley-Davidson FLTRXS Road Glide Special With Vin Ending x8790, 2019 Harley-Davidson FLHCS114 Heritage Classic With Vin Ending x7153, 2020 Cadillac Escalade With Vin Ending x7995 and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Miller v. USA et al
as 0:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Glenn Miller
Defendant: USA, Officer Hunt and Officer Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re Attorney Admission for Matthew L. Bowling
as 5:2024aa00059
Not Yet Classified: Attorney Admission Application
Modzelewski v. Craymer
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: Sally Modzelewski
Defendant: Gideon Craymer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sigmon v. SSA
as 0:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: Shade A. Sigmon
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
O'Hara v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Steven F. O'Hara
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense, United States Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
In re Attorney Admission for Matthew Anthony Hayes
as 6:2024aa00003
Not Yet Classified: Attorney Admission Application
Aker v. City of Dayton et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Octavian Aker
Defendant: City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bixler v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner: Danny Ray Bixler
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?