Cases 21 - 30 of 27,751
Pack v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Marty B Pack
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, CJ Ball, Joshua R Hartsell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Swann v. Sullivan County District Attorney
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Defendant:
Sullivan County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swann v. Barrong et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Defendant:
James Barrong and Chief Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (JRG2)
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joy Greene
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Collier v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Ronny Collier
Defendant:
Ronny Austin Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00188
Defendant:
Ronny Austin Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
2814 Seth Road LLC v. Ambient Services Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
2814 Seth Road LLC
Defendant:
Ambient Services Inc. and James Aurelius Locke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Turner v. Stanton
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Micah Kristian Neil Turner
Defendant:
D. Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Thompson
Defendant:
Jeff Cassidy and Sullivan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Malcolm Dillon, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Lori Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
