Cases 61 - 70 of 35,635
Neisen v. Atwood
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Judge Bonita Jo Atwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jeffries v. Vantell
as 3:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Joseph Marquis Jefferies and Joseph Marquis Jeffries
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coble et al v. TPS Parking Management, LLC
as 3:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donovan Coble and Kayla Coble
Defendant:
TPS Parking Management, LLC doing business as The Parking Spot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Burns v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Cecil Burns
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation, DG Promotions, Inc. and DG Retail, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Miller v. Dickerson
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dean Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mock v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Brian Ray Mock
Respondent:
Warden James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
