Cases 21 - 30 of 954
Arkansas Voter Integrity Initiative Inc et al v. Thurston et al
as 4:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Voter Integrity Initiative Inc, Conrad Reynolds and Donnie Scroggins
Defendant:
John Thurston, Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners and Election Systems and Software LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
USA v. Preston
as 4:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Lester G Preston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Debt to United States
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hill et al
as 5:2023mc00018
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Roy W. Hill, Eric N. Shelly, Clean Energy Technology Association, Inc. and others
Cintron v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Lizzette Vazquez Cintron
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services and Kristi Putnam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Martin et al v. Howard Memorial Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv04030
Plaintiff:
Bonita Martin, Bill Roberts and Pamela Garza
Defendant:
Howard Memorial Hospital and John Doe Insurance Carrier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Federal Trade Commission et al v. BINT Operations LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00518
Defendant:
Marlon DeAndre Moore, Marlon DeAndre Maiden, BINT Operations LLC and others
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, Federal Trade Commission and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Brisco et al
as 2:2023mc00016
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, Yas Castellum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Wire Belt Company of America, Inc. v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02190
Plaintiff:
Wire Belt Company of America, Inc.
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc. and ArcBest Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
