Cases 41 - 50 of 22,182
Preskitt v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Preskitt
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rothemeyer v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04048
Plaintiff:
Jeremia Lin Rothemeyer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
Markey Kyon Smith
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Curtis Morris
Defendant:
Jacob White and J B Hoyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Barefield v. USA
as 4:2024cv00424
Petitioner:
Christopher Barefield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gibby v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Katherine Seward Gibby
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederic v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Philip P Frederic
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stephan L Marshall
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Paul Wilson
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
