Cases 151 - 160 of 90,629
Daniel v. Veteran Affairs et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Veteran Affairs, Health Department and Glen Holding Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macon v. Marvin et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
James Isiah Macon
Defendant:
W. Marvin, Department of Corrections, Kilby Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Norwood v. Tennessee Credit Management Inc
as 3:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Eric Norwood
Defendant:
Tennessee Credit Management Inc a Tennessee corporation doing business as TCM Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Capotosto et al v. Pettis et al
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Capotosto and Donnie Capotosto
Defendant:
Brandon Michael Pettis and M&M Farms & Feed, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
