Cases 191 - 200 of 141,141
Jones v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Appalachian Power Company et al
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Tom Ellis, Amanda Congleton and Jeannie Clark
Defendant:
Homeserve USA Repair Management Corp., American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Appalachian Power Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCollum v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Kevin McCollum
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett and H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Davis
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and doing business as PHH Mortgage Service and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Harun v. Cutwright
as 1:2024cv00418
Respondent:
Warden Cutwright
Petitioner:
Gladys Harun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boyd v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00420
Petitioner:
Lonnie Boyd
Respondent:
Warden E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kirby v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00421
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Amber Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Coleman v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
Anthony Coleman
Respondent:
Mr. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
