Cases 1 - 10 of 66,556
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Northcross v. Jackson, County of et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Defendant:
Jackson, County of, Danielle Lancaster and Rob Ratton
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Northcross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Magnus et al
as 4:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Maurice Culclager, William Straughn, Tommy Bourgeois and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Odem, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Pauline Keith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Beard v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00803
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Francis Christine Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holden v. River Region Psychiatry Associates, L.L.C.
as 5:2024cv05196
Defendant:
River Region Psychiatry Associates, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Donnie Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Rhoades v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Dusty Rhoades
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Maze and Sheriff John Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCAP Environmental LLC v. Alamo Supplies LLC
as 4:2024cv00799
Defendant:
Alamo Supplies LLC
Plaintiff:
ARCAP Environmental LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chaney v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Carlton Lamont Chaney, Sr
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
