Cases 161 - 170 of 23,216
Howard v. Andover Public Schools, et al
as 24-1268
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HOWARD, individually and as next friend of P.H. and B.H.
Defendant:
ANDOVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MAGDA PARVEY, Superintendent of Schools, CAITLIN BROWN, Principal, Andover High School and others
US v. Perry
as 24-1437
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
KEVIN A. PERRY, JR.
Interested Party:
CORNERSTONE BANK, EAGLE ACORN ACRES, LLC, BAY STATE SAVINGS BANK and others
Alvarado-Hernandez, et al v. Garland
as 24-1447
Petitioner:
MAIDELIN NOEMI ALVARADO-HERNANDEZ, JOSE ZALDIVAR-VASQUEZ and H.C.S.A.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Silva Braganca Lemos, et al v. Garland
as 24-1440
Petitioner:
IAGO SILVA BRAGANCA LEMOS, ISABELA RODRIGUES LEMOS BRAGANCA, I. B. L. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Benitez Caceres, et al v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
MIRCA BENITEZ CACERES, GUILLERMO CACERES, ISRAEL CACERES and others
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee
Doe 3 v. Executive Office of the President, et al
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
MS. JANE DOE 3
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, the White House and HONORABLE LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, the Secretary of Defense
Interested Party:
IAN REYES BUENAVENTURA
Graham v. Edmark
as 24-1456
Petitioner:
MELVIN C. GRAHAM
Respondent:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison for Men
Hassell v. Kimbark, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW-LANE HASSELL
Defendant:
DEVIN AILEEN KIMBARK, CHERYL L. KIMBARK, MARK KIMBARK and others
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
