Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 151
Crosby, et al v. Mills
as 20-1822
Defendant / Appellee: JANET T. MILLS, Governor, State of Maine
Plaintiff: RAYMOND BOSHOLD, KARL WARD, JO BOSHOLD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICK SAVAGE, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Identified Class Members on behalf of TWO BROTHERS LLC doing business as SUNDAY RIVER BREWING COMPANY, LINDSEY CROSBY, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Identified Class Members, JAMES FAHEY, Individually and on Behalf of all Other Identified Class Members and others
Modeski, et al v. Summit Retail Solutions, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1747
Plaintiff: IIESHIA MEYERS, JEREMY WILLIAMS, ARIELLE MONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GIOVANNI ZAMMITO, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, NATHAN DAMBOISE, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, JEFFREY WOLFERT, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees and others
Defendant / Appellee: SUMMIT RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Jones v. Ryan
as 20-1417
Petitioner / Appellant: TIMOTHY E. JONES
Respondent / Appellee: KELLY A. RYAN, Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium and KELLY A. RYAN, Superintendent, MCI-Shirley
Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP v. Collins, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1397
Interested Party: JOHN TARANTINO, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF RHODE ISLAND, ANDREW HORWITZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARASCO & NESSELBUSH, LLP
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, TARA COLLINS, individually and in her official capacity as Supervisory Attorney of ODAR, CAROLYN TEDINO, individually and in her official capacity as Regional Management Officer for Boston Social Security Administration and others
Defendant: PAUL DORSEY, individually in his capacity as a former Associate at M&N and in his official capacity as Attorney Advisor for ODAR, KYLE E. POSEY, individually in his capacity as a former Associate at M&N and in his official capacity as Attorney Advisor for Social Security Administration, JOSEPH P. WILSON, individually in his capacity as a former Associate at M&N and in his official capacity as Attorney Advisor for ODAR and others
Wong, et al v. FMR LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON BAILIS, MYRL JEFFCOAT, KAREN PETTUS and others
Defendant / Appellee: FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY, FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST CO., FMR LLC and others
Plaintiff: CATEENIA D. JOHNSON, on behalf of the T-Mobile USA, Inc. 401 (K) Retirement Savings Plan and Trust and on behalf of all other similarly situated Employee Benefit Plans, TYLER WAYNE SILLS, on behalf of the T-Mobile USA, Inc. 401 (K) Retirement Savings Plan and Trust and on behalf of all other similarly situated Employee Benefit Plans, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UFCW LOCAL 23 & GIANT EAGLE PENSION FUND and others
Jones v. Mitchell, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DOUGLAS L. BOWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDWARD T. JONES
Defendant / Appellee: LISA A. MITCHELL, MICHAEL DEVINE, JOHN F. CAMELO and others
Jones v. Dolan Connly P.C., et al
as 20-1014
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE, KATHLEEN M. ALLEN, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and others
Defendant: JANE DOE and CINDY SILVA
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL M. JONES
Newton Covenant Church, et al v. Great American Insurance Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARMEN ALDINGER, ROSELIND PICARD, THOMAS DEVOL and others
Defendant / Appellee: GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
US v. Leonard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1392
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: TONY LEONARD, a/k/a Tom Cat, a/k/a Thomas Lee Jones
Jones v. US
as 19-1353
Petitioner / Appellant: EDDIE JONES
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?