Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Harden Manufacturing Co., et al v. Pfizer, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Haynes, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 11-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Jackson v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant: CYNTHIA JACKSON, as Administratrix of the Estate of Leonard J. Giguere
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: STEPHEN G. GERZOF, MD
Nkesha v. Holder, Jr.
as 11-1424
Petitioner: JACKSON NKESHA
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Nascimento v. US
as 11-1301
Petitioner: JACKSON NASCIMENTO
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. US Department of Health
as 10-2204
Amicus Curiae: EASTERN BANK, NATIONAL GRID USA, NATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES (DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS), KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, THOMAS E. PRICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Intervenor: BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
US v. Vargas-Davila We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1907
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: RAYMOND VARGAS-DAVILA, a/k/a Jackson
Chase v. RI Department of Corrections, et al
as 10-1175
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER BOTELHO, MICHAEL A. BRENNAN, ALFRED BRISSETTE and others
Movant - Appellant: PARRISH CHASE
Defendant - Appellee: RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Interested Party: MICHAEL RICHARDSON, THOMAS WEBB, KENNETH WILSON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?