Cases 71 - 80 of 165
Puerto Rico Telephone Company v. Ayala-Rivera, et al
as 19-1718
Defendant / Appellant:
CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP AYALA-ROSADO, XIOMARA ROSADO-CARTAGENA, INGRID RAMOS-MATOS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Claro
Defendant:
JANE DOE 1
Doe v. Baker
as 19-1527
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES D. BAKER
Petitioner:
JANE DOE, C.W. /Imprisoned Somewhere
Petitioner / Appellant:
JANE DOE, S.W.
Bevilacqua, et al v. FDIC
as 19-1482
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, MORA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
LANGHE CORPORATION, d/b/a Restaurante Barolo
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS BEVILACQUA and HILDA I. PEREZ-ROSADO
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Doral Bank
Doe, et al v. Pawtucket School Department, et al
as 19-1458
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAUN W. STROBEL, in his capacity as Pawtucket City Treasurer, KAREN DUBE, in her individual and official capacity as a teacher and member of the Pawtucket Learning Academy, KERRI DAY, in her individual and official capacity as a teacher and member of the Pawtucket Learning Academy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, a minor and in her own right and JANE DOE, a minor in and for her own behalf and in her own right
Torres-Torres, et al v. Perello-Borras, et al
as 19-1399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS J. MALAVE-MAYOL, MARIA DE LOS A. RIVERA-DIAZ, WILFREDO SOTO-ARCE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROSENDO VELA-BIRRIEL, in his Personal and Official Capacity as Deputy Superintendent in Charge of Operations, JAIME PERELLO-BORRAS, in his Personal and Official Capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, JULIO MOJICA, in his Personal and Official Capacity as Director of Facilities Conservation and Technical Services and others
Defendant:
EDUARDO BHATIA-GAUTIER, in his Personal and Official Capacity as President of the Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
NELSON RIVERA-PEREZ and BLANCA SERRANO-MALDONADO
Interested Party:
CRIM
Reale v. DCYF, et al
as 19-1265
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRY LONERGAN, BETHANN MYERS, DIANNE LEYDEN and others
Defendant:
CYNTHIA ROBERGE, SUSAN LYONS, COVENTRY, RI and others
Plaintiff:
LEEANN CAGNINA, next friend of Jane Doe and BENJAMIN LIGERI, next friend of Jane Doe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL REALE, next friend of Janice Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Falto-de Roman v. Municipal Gov't of Mayaguez, et al
as 17-1653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELBA I. FALTO-DE ROMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYAGUEZ, PR and JOSE GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ, as Mayor of the City of Mayaguez
Defendant:
ELENA MARTINEZ, as Member of the Boardo of the Head-Start Program in the City of Mayaguez, LUIS OLIVERAS, as Member of the Board of Director of the Head-Start Program in the City of Mayaguez, LUIS OJEDA, as Member of the Board of Director of the Head-Start Program in the City of Mayaguez and others
Diaz-Colon, et al v. Solivan-Solivan, et al
as 17-1602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS DIAZ-COLON, on his own and on behalf of his minor son J.L.D.R., LINDA DELGADO, on behalf of her minor daughter D.M.D.D., ZORAIDA COLON-CARTAGENA and others
Plaintiff:
CARMELO COLON-RIVERA, ORLANDO COLON-VELAZQUEZ, ORLANDO RAMOS-FELIX and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ANIBAL SOLIVAN-SOLIVAN, HECTOR TIRADO, DANIEL COLON and others
Defendant:
CANDELARIA, UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS A TO J, JOSE FIGUEROA and others
Interested Party:
ERASMO RODRIGUEZ-VAZQUEZ and PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Drewry v. ME Department of Correction, et al
as 17-1535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON BOONE DREWRY
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD ABBOTT, THOMAS AVERILL, NATHAN STAPLES, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
