Cases 1 - 10 of 674
US v. Mulero-Vargas
as 24-1503
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSE MULERO-VARGAS, t/n Jose Angel Mulero-Vargas
Jenkins v. US, et al
as 24-1513
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, I.A.F.F. United States, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Waltermeyer v. Hazlewood, et al
as 24-1355
Plaintiff:
BROC T. WALTERMEYER
Defendant:
DIANE L. KISLER, RICHARD A. LUNA, Warden, FCI Berlin, ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin and others
Starling v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 24-1341
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY STARLING, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
ONPROCESS TECHNOLOGY, INC. and AT&T SERVICES, INC
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
